cross_cutting / public_comment

e a little bit of a response. Um, okay, let me let me finish my thought there on that issue. Um, it's I will acknowledge that the staff report didn't address the SIPA comments. That's disappointing. The or any of the <mark>public comment</mark>s didn't reference <mark>public comment</mark>s at all when and there were several before the staff report. Um, and it I don't know, but it appears given the timing of things that the applicant was informed of the content of the concurrency analysis regarding 179th and 50th that it

Related Matches