building_development
Clark County Council · April 27, 2026
Confidence
direct
direct
Method
keyword
keyword
Timestamp
2:07:05–2:07:20 ↗
2:07:05–2:07:20 ↗
Keywords
capital facilities, PUD, UGA, concurrency, comprehensive plan, subdivision, zoning, rezoning, affordable housing, annexation, Density, density, infrastructure
capital facilities, PUD, UGA, concurrency, comprehensive plan, subdivision, zoning, rezoning, affordable housing, annexation, Density, density, infrastructure
Similarity
34%
34%
proposed inter-local agreements as frameworks, may contemplate de-designation of ag lands and inclusion in the <mark>UGA</mark> now, with details of TDR program to follow later. And that is where the risk lies. I have significant concern about allowing automatic <mark>UGA</mark> expansion after time expires and there's no TDR program. Rather, those lands should be re-designated agricultural if a TDR is not in place by the end of the chosen period. There needs to be a maintained overlay during that process until TDRs and
Related Matches
| Meeting | Date | Confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|
| City Council Workshops | 2026-04-06 | direct | View |
| City Council Workshops | 2026-04-06 | direct | View |
| City Council Workshops | 2026-04-06 | direct | View |
| City Council Workshops | 2026-04-06 | direct | View |
| City Council Workshops | 2026-04-06 | direct | View |