County staff educated residents on how to effectively participate in land use decisions through public comments and hearings. They emphasized that public testimony must be tied directly to specific Clark County Code approval criteria rather than generalized concerns like property values or personal preferences. Additionally, staff outlined the differences between various review processes and offered practical tips for delivering concise, factual oral testimony that impacts the final decision.
Cross_cutting
Clark County Community Development Learning Lab · Mar 19, 2026 · 27:00–27:05 · Watch on CVTV ↗
Keywords: public hearing public comment public testimony
What was said
25:59 doesn't gain any more weight of what was discussed. That makes sense. And a lot of it would be emotional rather than-- Right, right. But it is your right to submit that as comments if you want. Yeah, OK, OK. You said it was the second and fourth, and I don't know if you said Tuesday or Thursday. Thursday. Thank you. You don't have to raise your hand. You could just say it. This is just-- yeah. Would you have any examples of effective testimony, et cetera, that you could share? Does that make sense? Yeah, no, written comments. Yeah. I can submit-- I can share any of those with you. That would be that are effective. Yes, yeah, the things that are based on standards, that have more traction as an argument. That's what you're looking for. Exactly.
26:58 Of course. Anything you submit as public comments is also public record also. So just keep that in mind. So we could see that. And again, you know, it's just we're trying really hard to mitigate in a positive way. We may not be able to stop it. Can we make it the best for us, if at all possible? Right. What you've stated there is important, right? Because if a project is proposed that meets the standards, we're not allowed to deny it based on popularity. It's just-- And we understand that. OK. We do. So with reduced privacy, if I say the window at level three will look directly in my window, that's not reduced privacy. Well-- Or it is. It reduces your privacy. But we don't have any standards other than a minimum screening
27:58 that would be required. And we don't really have-- we don't have requirements that require 30-foot tall screenings, right?
Evidence (1 match)
cross_cutting keyword 27:00–27:05 public hearing, public comment, public testimony
I can submit-- I can share any of those with you. That would be that are effective. Yes, yeah, the things that are based on standards, that have more traction as an argument. That's what you're looking for. Exactly. Of course. Anything you submit as public comments is also public record also. So just keep that in mind. So we could see that. And again, you know, it's just we're trying really hard to mitigate in a positive way. We may not be able to stop it. Can we make it the best for us, if at a